
handle: 10642/6110
Article 1 is a literature review which covered the use of instructions in stimulus equivalence research in two time periods. The results showed that instructions differ to a great extent. The most commonly used instruction was categorized as not task specific instructions, followed by general instructions. Article 2 is an empirical study which investigated if different types of instructions affected responding in accordance with stimulus equivalence. The main results showed that the group which got general instructions had a higher yield of equivalence class responding compared to the other two groups which got specific instructions or no instructions at all.
Master i læring i komplekse systemer
Conditional discriminations, Stimulus equivalence, Instructions, Matching-to-sample
Conditional discriminations, Stimulus equivalence, Instructions, Matching-to-sample
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
