
handle: 10641/1973
In this paper we want to expose the different meanings that Husserl assigns to the concept of givenness and given in the framework of his static phenomenology (basically Logical Investigations, Ideen 1 and his Logos-Artikel of 1911). The importance of the concept of Gegebenheit will help us to clarify the basic differences between the phenomenological and the neo-kantian (especially Heinrich Rickert’s) approach about the question of knowledge in the frame of transcendental philosophy. Moreover, on the basis of these differences we will try to clarify some basic frames of the phenomenological method like intentionality, constitution, categorical intuition and transcendental reduction. pre-print 735 KB
Neo-Kantianism, Phenomenology, Rickert, Husserl, Givenness
Neo-Kantianism, Phenomenology, Rickert, Husserl, Givenness
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
