
handle: 10616/45549
The idea that our body plays an important role in visual perception has a long history in storytelling and philosophy. Some ideas are very intuitive. For example, few will disagree with the notion that smaller people perceive the world to be bigger, and vice versa, that larger people perceive the world to be smaller. In contrast, more controversial ideas regarding the role of our body in visual perception have been debated by philosophers. According to these philosophers, the very nature of visual perception lies in the fact that we have a body that moves in space. Since George Berkeley (1685 – 1753) first formalized such a fundamental role for our body in visual perception, different philosophical theories have branched out to account for the latest scientific findings. Although experimental psychologists and neuroscientists have long neglected these intriguing philosophical accounts, the recent development of body-ownership illusions allowed for a more rigorous investigation of the supposed link between our body and visual perception. In body-ownership illusions, research participants experience an artificial body (or body-part) to be their own. These illusions allow for the dissociation between the subjective experience that your body belongs to you (i.e. body-ownership) and the mere visual impression of your body from a first-person perspective. The studies that comprise this thesis use different ownership illusions to investigate the role of body-ownership in visual perception, and the role of visual perception in body-ownership, with visual perception being an umbrella-term for both visuospatial perception and visual awareness. In Study I and Study II we investigated the mechanisms by which body-size influences the perceived size of the world, by having participants experience ownership of different sized (and sometimes invisible) bodies. Our results show that this own-body-size effect does not rely on visual information per se, but instead, on the recalibration between visual and tactile information that ...
Thesis, 150, 100
Thesis, 150, 100
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
