
handle: 10550/34444
According to Contextualism about knowledge, it is possible that a subject, with the same amount of evidence and the same degree of conviction, knows that P in a context and not in another. In this paper, I favor the invarationist conception of knowledge by drawing a distinction between belief and acceptance. “Know”, I defend, does not change in meaning across contexts, although -I acknowledge- it is not correct to self ascribe knowledge when one does not accept that P.
Según la posición contextualista puede ocurrir que con las mismas evidencias y el mismo grado de convicción, un sujeto sepa que P en un contexto y no en otro. Mediante la distinción entre aceptación y creencia, se combate tal posición en favor de una concepció invariantista del conocimiento. “Saber” no varía de significado con los contextos, aunque -reconozco- no es correcto auto atribuirse conocimiento cuando no se acepta que P.
contextualismo, Lewis, contextualism, invariantism, Coneixement, Teoria del, invariantismo
contextualismo, Lewis, contextualism, invariantism, Coneixement, Teoria del, invariantismo
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
