
handle: 10550/108744
Faced with the “moles” of always interpreting in a restrictive way any limitation to the capacity of people with disabilities, as well as the legal prohibitions imposed on their guardianship or assistance positions, in this work its author proposes its review from a Internationalist interpretation of our norms in combination with «old» principles, updated to new realities, such as the favorabilia amplianda, odiosa restringenda and the in dubio pro capacitate, which do not always necessarily lead to that –intended– restrictive interpretation.; Frente al «topos» de interpretar siempre de forma restrictiva cualquier limitación a la capacidad de las personas con discapacidad, así como de las prohibiciones legales impuestas a sus cargos tutelares o asistenciales, en este trabajo su autor propone su revisión desde una interpretación internacionalista y jurisprudencial de nuestras normas en combinación con “viejos” principios, actualizados a nuevas realidades, como son el favorabilia amplianda, odiosa restringenda y el in dubio pro capacitate, que no siempre conducen necesariamente a aquella –pretendida– interpretación restrictiva.
UNESCO:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS
UNESCO:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
