
handle: 10486/705624
In this article we show that the Escrito de las diez causas, a text which some authors believed to be lost and attributed to Juan de Vergara, has never been missing, because it is a well-known document of which we conserve many manuscript copies. We also dispute Vergara’s authorship, defending instead that it was a text agreed on by consensus among the opponents of the purity of blood statute promulgated by archbishop Juan Martínez Silíceo
En el presente artículo se muestra que el Escrito de las diez causas, que algunos autores creyeron perdido y atribuyeron a Juan de Vergara, nunca estuvo desaparecido, pues se conserva en muchas copias manuscritas y es un documento sobradamente conocido. Asimismo, se discute la autoría de Vergara y se defiende que fue un texto consensuado entre los contradictores del estatuto de limpieza de sangre del arzobispo Juan Martínez Silíceo
Juan Martínez Silíceo (c.1477-1557), estatus de limpieza de sangre, Juan de Vergara (1492-1557), conversos, Historia, catedral de Toledo
Juan Martínez Silíceo (c.1477-1557), estatus de limpieza de sangre, Juan de Vergara (1492-1557), conversos, Historia, catedral de Toledo
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
