
handle: 10481/89176
Se propone en este artículo describir el empleo del discurso directo e indirectoen 72 entrevistas del corpus Encuestas de habla urbana de Sevilla, basado encriterios lingüísticos, pragmáticos y sociales. Los resultados muestran unapreferencia por el uso del discurso directo por parte de los hablantes entrevistados.El marco introductor más utilizado es el canónico, esto es, mediante un verbo ydecir es el más empleado para reproducir. Además, se muestra una preferenciapara referir el discurso de forma directa. Asimismo, es la tercera generación y elsociolecto bajo quienes indican mayor tendencia al uso del discurso referido.
This study describes the use of reported speech in a sample of 72 oral interviews taken from the corpus Encuestas de habla urbana of Seville, based on linguistic, pragmatic and social criteria. The results showed that the questioned informants preferred to use direct speech. The most frequently introducing frame was the canonic one -with a verb- and decir was the most employed verb to report. They also prefer to report their own and others’ words by using direct reported speech. Regarding the social factors, the third generation and the low sociolect show a bigger tendency to the reported speech use.
Discurso Indirecto, Entrevistas Semidirigidas, Sociolinguistics, Indirect Reported Speech, Sociolingüística, Direct Reported Speech, Corpus, Discurso Directo, Semi-Controlled Interviews
Discurso Indirecto, Entrevistas Semidirigidas, Sociolinguistics, Indirect Reported Speech, Sociolingüística, Direct Reported Speech, Corpus, Discurso Directo, Semi-Controlled Interviews
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
