
It is generally accepted at present that the emperor Julian (360-63) was reburied in the Church of the Holy Apostles at Constantinople at some unknown date after his initial burial outside Tarsus in Cilicia in 363. This assumption rests on the fact that a series of late Byzantine sources describe the presence of his tomb in this church, from Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus (913-59), who included a catalogue of imperial tombs in his De Ceremoniis, to the epitomator Zonaras (c.1118). Most modern commentators have tended to assume that the transfer of the tomb occurred probably within the latter half of the fourth century. It is my argument that Julian’s tomb was never removed from Tarsus, but that the tomb later identified as his had probably belonged to Crispus instead, the eldest son and Caesar of Constantine I (306-37).
Roman emperor, Byzantine history, Julian, Emperor of Rome, 331-363., Julian the Apostate, burial, Byzantine empire
Roman emperor, Byzantine history, Julian, Emperor of Rome, 331-363., Julian the Apostate, burial, Byzantine empire
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
