
handle: 10419/45033
In diesem Papier werden die Effekte eines Overconfidence-Bias auf das Koordinationsproblem innerhalb eines Teams betrachtet. In einem Team aus zwei Agenten, deren Arbeitseinsätze komplementär sind, zeigt sich, dass ein Overconfidence-Bias oder aber auch die Antizipation eines overconfidenten Partners das entstandene Koordinationsproblem abschwächen und möglicherweise sogar zu einer Pareto-Verbesserung führen können.
This paper analyses the effects of overconfidence on a coordination problem within a team of two agents and in the presence of effort complementarities. We show that in several settings an overconfidence bias or the mere anticipation of having an overconfident partner might not only help mitigate the coordination problem but also result in a Pareto improvement.
L23, ddc:330, Gruppenarbeit, Pareto-Optimum, D62, Bias, Verhaltensökonomik, Prinzipal-Agent-Theorie, D21, jel: jel:D62, jel: jel:D21, jel: jel:L23
L23, ddc:330, Gruppenarbeit, Pareto-Optimum, D62, Bias, Verhaltensökonomik, Prinzipal-Agent-Theorie, D21, jel: jel:D62, jel: jel:D21, jel: jel:L23
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
