
handle: 10419/221463
Research Joint Ventures and subsidies are important R&D policy instruments. The regulator, however, is unlikely to know all the relevant information to regulate R&D optimally. The extent to which there are appropriability problems is one such variable that is private information to the firms within the industry. In a duopoly setting we analyze the characteristics of a first-best and second-best R&D policy where the government can either allow Research Joint Ventures or not and give lump-sum subisides to the parties involved. The second-best R&D policy improves upon the policy of an unsophisicated government by integrating reports of the firms on their spillovers and the correlation between the R&D spillovers of the firms into its formulation.
502009 Corporate finance, 502009 Finanzwirtschaft, ddc:330, 502047 Volkswirtschaftstheorie, 502047 Economic theory, Bid-Ask Spread; Indirect Competition; Market Structure, jel: jel:D43, jel: jel:G12
502009 Corporate finance, 502009 Finanzwirtschaft, ddc:330, 502047 Volkswirtschaftstheorie, 502047 Economic theory, Bid-Ask Spread; Indirect Competition; Market Structure, jel: jel:D43, jel: jel:G12
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
