
handle: 10356/94027 , 10220/7143
Numerical analysis has been shown as an important tool in studying the dynamics of harmful algal blooms, exploring the causes, mechanism and prediction of red tides. In this paper, various multivariate statistical methods and biophysical models are reviewed in examining the roles of biological, chemical, physical factors and biological-physical interactions in red tides. These models have achieved some degrees of success in describing the underlying dynamical processes. However, relatively poor knowledge about physiological responses of bloom species to the physical field has greatly limited the predictive ability of existing models. The improvement of existing models will depend on a better understanding of the physical, physiological, and ecological processes and their interactions. Accepted version
570, DRNTU::Engineering::Mathematics and analysis, :Engineering::Environmental engineering::Water supply [DRNTU], DRNTU::Engineering::Environmental engineering::Water supply, :Engineering::Mathematics and analysis [DRNTU]
570, DRNTU::Engineering::Mathematics and analysis, :Engineering::Environmental engineering::Water supply [DRNTU], DRNTU::Engineering::Environmental engineering::Water supply, :Engineering::Mathematics and analysis [DRNTU]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
