Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Estudo Geralarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Estudo Geral
Master thesis . 2012
Data sources: Estudo Geral
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

State of the art of dental impressions: digital techniques

Authors: Braz, Luis Gaia;

State of the art of dental impressions: digital techniques

Abstract

Introduction: Among keystones for the prognosis of fixed prosthesis rehabilitations are the impression quality and the respective work model. During conventional impressions, some errors induced by issues related to materials, techniques or human errors could occur and lead to information loss. 3D dental scanners have been in development since the 80’s and they are a link to present and future of dental impressions and dental restorations. Objective: The main objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the trueness of the iTero® CDIS by comparing the dimensions of a virtual model obtained by digital impression, the original model and the correspondent plaster model obtained by a traditional impression. Materials and Methods: The pilot study was divided in two parts, both using the iTero®, and five Frasaco AG-3 acrylic teeth FDI 46, which were then impressed by a conventional technique and poured with type IV dental plaster. The first part consisted of the comparison of the measurements of the scanned acrylic teeth with the acrylic teeth and the dental plaster teeth, measured with a digital caliper. The second part compared the acrylic and dental plaster teeth while scanned by the iTero® and measured by it. Results: On the first part of the pilot study, a pairwise comparison test showed a statistical match (P>0.05) between the acrylic teeth and the iTero®, and the dental plaster teeth and the iTero®. On the second part, iTero® readings comparison of both acrylic and dental plaster models showed no statistical differences. Conclusion: Digital impressions seem a promising tool to be explored in the near future, even though more tests are required to evaluate its in-vivo performance. The iTero® dental scanner according to our pilot study, and considering its limitations, reflects trueness on the measurements performed.

Trabalho final do 5º ano com vista à atribuição do grau de mestre no âmbito do ciclo de estudos de Mestrado Integrado em Medicina Dentária apresentado à Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Digital Impressions Error, Digital Impressions, Conventional Impressions, CAD/CAM

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green