Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/9875
Barks of Pinus pinaster and Pinus radiata were studied as source of procyanidins; these raw materials, considered a byproduct of forestal industry, were extracted with ethanol. The extract was partially fractionated to obtain an aqueous fraction (FA) containing a great part of the procyanidins from barks and with potential application to both food and medical fields. FAs were rich in polyphenols, 65–87% of which were procyanidins; the mean degree of polymerization (mDP) was 7.9 for radiata (rFA) and 10.6 for pinaster (pFA) varieties.
The aqueous fractions were chromatographed on Sephadex LH-20 to obtain specific fractions differing in DP and composition. These fractions were analysed by thiolysis with cysteamine, followed by RP-HPLC. Results showed that (+)-catechin was the main terminal unit for both barks and also the main extension unit for radiata. In contrast (-)-epicatechin was predominant as extension unit in pinaster and this could have implications for applications in oils, emulsions and biological systems.
In terms of antiradical activity, expressed as specific antiradical units, the entire rFA gave the best results, together with rF5. For P. pinaster bark, the best results were achieved for fractions F5–F8, with DP 7–22. The whole fraction from radiata represents an economic alternative of great interest because the fractionation costs can be avoided.
We thank Spanish Ministry MCyT for Project PPQ2003-06602-C04-01 and 02.
10 pages, 5 figures.-- Printed version published Feb 2007.
Peer reviewed
Bark, Pinus radiata, Aqueous fraction, Antiradical power, Pinus pinaster, Fractionation, Procyanidins
Bark, Pinus radiata, Aqueous fraction, Antiradical power, Pinus pinaster, Fractionation, Procyanidins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 78 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 46 |

Views provided by UsageCounts