
pmid: 24492564
handle: 10261/98015
The aim of this study was to compare automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) techniques to assess bacterial diversity in the rumen of sheep. Sheep were fed 2 diets with 70% of either alfalfa hay or grass hay, and the solid (SOL) and liquid (LIQ) phases of the rumen were sampled immediately before feeding (0 h) and at 4 and 8 h postfeeding. Both techniques detected similar differences between forages, with alfalfa hay promoting greater (P 0.05) over the postfeeding period were detected by DGGE. The ARISA technique showed lower (P 0.05) in bacterial diversity between both rumen phases were detected by DGGE. Under the conditions of this study, the DGGE was not sensitive enough to detect some changes in ruminal bacterial communities, and therefore ARISA was considered more accurate for assessing bacterial diversity of ruminal samples. The results highlight the influence of the fingerprinting technique used to draw conclusions on factors affecting ruminal bacterial diversity.
Spanish C.I.C.Y.T AGL2011-22628 AGL2008-04707-C02-02 Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Espana AP 2006-03049
Peer reviewed
6 páginas.
Rumen, Sheep, Forage, Bacteria, Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis, Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, Animal Feed, DNA Fingerprinting, Diet, Automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Animals, Postfeeding time, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Ruminal bacteria
Rumen, Sheep, Forage, Bacteria, Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis, Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, Animal Feed, DNA Fingerprinting, Diet, Automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Animals, Postfeeding time, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Ruminal bacteria
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
