Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/88809
A field experiment with 2,200 m2 was performed from 2004 to 2006, in northeast Portugal, to evaluate the response of a commercial olive (Olea europaea L. cv. >Cobrançosa>) orchard to different irrigation regimes on growth and yield. The trees were subjected to three irrigation treatments: rainfed conditions (T0), irrigation with 30% (T1) and 100% (T2) of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). Seasonal dynamics of stomatal conductance (gs) and shoot water potential varied among treatments, and responded to soil water content and atmospheric evaporative demand. Irrigation increases gs, in association with increases in water status. Annual ETc varied from around 300 mm in T0 to 700 mm in T2. Irrigation increased fruit yield, due to the greater number of fruits per tree and higher mass per fruit. Differences in oil yield among treatments were closely related to fruit yield. Moreover, oil accumulation in the fruit was delayed in rainfed conditions. Variations in fruit and oil yield was strongly influenced by variations in ETc. On average, the amount of oil produced per unit intercepted PAR increased with irrigation and for both irrigated treatments was more than double those of T0. A strategy of continuous deficit irrigation with only 30% of maximum ETc may have a very beneficial effect, since it allows increasing oil yield to more than double that of rainfed conditions. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
This study was supported by project AGRO 175 of AGRO-INIA program of Ministério da Agricultura (Portugal) and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia do Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e do Ensino Superior (Portugal). Financial support for the preparation of this manuscript was also provided by project AGR 595 of Consejería de Innovación, Junta de Andalucía (Spain).
Peer Reviewed
Yield, Evapotranspiration, Water use eficiency, Olive, Growth, Irrigation
Yield, Evapotranspiration, Water use eficiency, Olive, Growth, Irrigation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 79 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 30 | |
| downloads | 81 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts