Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Egg Production

Authors: Ganias, Konstantinos; Murua, Hilario; Domínguez-Petit, Rosario; Claramunt, G.; Gonçalves, Patricia; Juanes, Francis; Kennedy, James; +14 Authors
Abstract

The present chapter deals with the estimation of female fecundity in fishes, mostly teleosts. The chapter is organized in three main blocks. The first block is devoted to technical issues of fish fecundity measurements from fixation, preservation and treatment of ovarian material to automatic oocyte counts. The use of certain staining protocols for the identification of follicular types in ovarian whole mounts and of inexpensive equipments in oocyte counting is also described. Because histology still constitutes the most unbiased method for identifying ovarian structures an array of stereological methods for estimating follicular intensity from assumption/model based methods (e.g. Weibel and oocyte packing density (OPD) method) to assumption/model free methods such as the physical disector or the fractionator principle is also provided. The second block is focused on methods used for the estimation of important variables such as batch fecundity (using hydrated oocytes and or previous developmental stages), daily fecundity and spawning fraction, S. Special emphasis is given to the estimation of S; the postovulatory follicle (POF) method is explicitly described together with its most common bias issues related to POF staging and ageing. In addition, methods that are based on imminent spawners, methods for stocks with high S values, and methods based on the assessment of spawning sites are also descibed. The third block incorporates knowledge acquired in the two other blocks to review what is needed to estimate the annual realized fecundity (the ultimate goal of fecundity studies) in determinate and indeterminate fish species. The autodiametric method for estimating potential annual fecundity, and the impacts of fecundity dowregualtion by atresia and of skipped-spawning in determinate spawners are also included. In short, this chapter will offer the reader an overview of all methodological aspects that need to be considered in fish fecundity investigations.

COST Action FRESH (FA0601). NAFO Working Group on Reproductive Potential

109 páginas, 53 figuras, 5 tablas

Keywords

Batch fecundity, Methodology, Daily fecundity, Annual fecundity, Spawning frequency

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 417
    download downloads 413
  • 417
    views
    413
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
417
413
Green
Related to Research communities