Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/75743
[EN] Laboratory decomposition experiments measuring the mineralization of C from plant residue are increasingly used to test the effects of different litter sources and soil conditions. To date, the most widely used methods are infra-red gas analysis (IRGA) and gas chromatography, which are time-consuming, and relatively expensive and complex to operate. The aim of this study was to devise a simple and rapid laboratory method to assess litter decomposition rates at frequent time intervals. We modified the MicroResp™ system to measure the amount of CO2 produced by two soils supporting contrasting microbial communities and containing the litter of eight crop species. The method was sensitive enough to differentiate both soil microbial communities and litter qualities. The method combines the accuracy of gas chromatography with the speed of absorbance measurements obtained via microplate readers. This technique provides an effective means for devising complex litter decomposition experiments capable of addressing the joint influence of multiple species, soil communities, environmental conditions, and their multiple interactions. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
We thank Sonia Merinero, Arturo Vizcaíno and José Miguel Alonso Rodrigo for their help during laboratory and field work, and three anonymous referees for improving the manuscript. PGP was supported by a postdoctoral contract from Comunidad de Madrid (REMEDINAL-2) and by a Fulbright fellowship from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación. RM was supported by the MICINN-Spain (grants AGL2010-10935-E and CGL2011-28778 and Ramón y Cajal contract).
Peer Reviewed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 41 |

Views provided by UsageCounts