Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/57009
The importance of stone colonisation by microorganisms has led to an extensive literature on mechanisms and rates of physicochemical degradation of stone surface, both in laboratory and field contexts. Biological colonisation of a stone surface depends on intrinsic stone parameters like mineral composition, texture, porosity, and permeability, as well as on environmental parameters. In the present study, quantification of stone surface roughness and its relationship to epilithic colonisation was demonstrated for three types of limestones throughout non-destructive techniques, namely optical surface roughness instrument and digital image analysis. According to the roughness average (Ra) and mean roughness depth (Rz) determined for Ançã limestone, Lioz limestone and Lecce stone, it can be concluded that great surface roughness stones render them prone to microbial colonisation.
rugosidad superficial, Rugosidad superficial, Piedra, stone, ephilitic colonisation, Colonización epilítica, non-destructive techniques, Stone, Técnicas no destructivas, Ephilitic colonisation, colonización epilítica, técnicas no destructivas, Surface roughness, Non-destructive techniques, surface roughness, TA401-492, Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials, piedra
rugosidad superficial, Rugosidad superficial, Piedra, stone, ephilitic colonisation, Colonización epilítica, non-destructive techniques, Stone, Técnicas no destructivas, Ephilitic colonisation, colonización epilítica, técnicas no destructivas, Surface roughness, Non-destructive techniques, surface roughness, TA401-492, Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials, piedra
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 35 | |
| downloads | 85 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts