Views provided by UsageCounts
AbstractMany mammals have brains substantially larger than expected for their body size, but the reasons for this remain ambiguous. Enlarged brains are metabolically expensive and require elongated developmental periods, and so natural selection should have favoured their evolution only if they provide counterbalancing advantages. One possible advantage is facilitating the construction of behavioural responses to unusual, novel or complex socio‐ecological challenges. This buffer effect should increase survival rates and favour a longer reproductive life, thereby compensating for the costs of delayed reproduction. Here, using a global database of 493 species, we provide evidence showing that mammals with enlarged brains (relative to their body size) live longer and have a longer reproductive lifespan. Our analysis supports and extends previous findings, accounting for the possible confounding effects of other life history traits, ecological and dietary factors, and phylogenetic autocorrelation. Thus, these findings provide support for the hypothesis that mammals counterbalance the costs of affording large brains with a longer reproductive life.
Mammals, Time Factors, Brain evolution, Lifespan, Behavioural flexibility, Reproduction, Longevity, Brain, Phenotypic plasticity, Organ Size, Phylogenetic generalized linear model, Linear Models, Behavioural flexibility, Animals, Body Weights and Measures, Cognitive buffer, Phylogeny
Mammals, Time Factors, Brain evolution, Lifespan, Behavioural flexibility, Reproduction, Longevity, Brain, Phenotypic plasticity, Organ Size, Phylogenetic generalized linear model, Linear Models, Behavioural flexibility, Animals, Body Weights and Measures, Cognitive buffer, Phylogeny
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 117 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 37 |

Views provided by UsageCounts