Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cryobiology
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cryobiology
Article . 2005
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of DNA damage in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) cryopreserved sperm

Authors: Cabrita, Elsa; Robles, V.; Rebordinos, Laureana; Sarasquete, Carmen; Herráez, M. P.;

Evaluation of DNA damage in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) cryopreserved sperm

Abstract

Cryopreservation causes several types of damage to spermatozoa, such as loss of plasma membrane integrity and functionality, loss of motility, and ATP content, resulting in decrease of fertility rates. This spermatozoal damage has been widely investigated for several marine and freshwater fish species. However, not much attention has been paid to the nuclear DNA. The objective of this study was to determine the degree to which cryopreservation induces spermatozoal DNA damage in two commercially cultured species, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata), both of which could benefit from the development of cryopreservation strategies on a large scale. We have used the single-cell gel electrophoresis, commonly known as Comet assay to detect strand breaks in DNA. This technique was performed on fresh and cryopreserved sperm from both species. In rainbow trout there was a significant increase in the averages of fragmented DNA and Olive tail moment after cryopreservation (11.19-30.29% tail DNA and 13.4-53.48% Olive tail moment in fresh and cryopreserved sperm, respectively), as well as in the proportion of cells with a high percentage of DNA fragmentation. For gilthead sea bream there were no significant differences in the percentage of tail DNA between the control samples and sperm diluted 1:6 and cryopreserved (28.23 and 31.3% DNA(t), respectively). However, an increase in the sperm dilution rate produced an increase in the percentage of DNA fragmentation (41.4%). Our study demonstrates that cryopreservation can induce DNA damage in these species, and that this fact should be taken into account in the evaluation of freezing/thawing protocols, especially when sperm cryopreservation will be used for gene bank purposes.

Keywords

Cryopreservation, Electrophoresis, Agar Gel, Male, Cell Separation, Spermatozoa, Sea Bream, Rainbow trout, Gilthead sea bream, Oncorhynchus mykiss, DNA damage, Animals, Female, Comet assay, DNA Damage, Semen Preservation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    150
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 51
  • 51
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
150
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
51
Green