
doi: 10.1515/flin.2012.2
handle: 10261/391015
This article analyses a phenomenon not frequently dealt with in the grammar of Romance languages, namely, closest conjunct (number) agreement (CCA) between determiners, adjectives and nouns in Spanish structures containing conjoined singular Ns: [DP D (A) [N1 y N 2] (A)]. Using new corpus data, we apply statistical tests to assess the theoretical and empirical claims of the analysis. We first offer a description of the plural semantics of these structures. Regarding syntax, we show that, despite the plural semantics of the DP, determiners and prenominal adjectives agree with the closest conjunct (N1) (e.g. Una. f.sg fuerte.sg lluvia.f.sg y viento.m.sg azotaron.pl la ciudad ‘A heavy rain and wind battered the city’). As for postnominal adjectives, CCA with N2 alternates with full (plural) agreement (e.g. Una.f.sg lluvia.f.sg y viento.m.sg{inoportuno.m.sg/inoportunos.m.pl} azotaron.pl la ciudad ‘An inopportune rain and wind battered the city’). Within a generative framework, we analyse CCA in the prenominal field and full agreement of postnominal adjectives as syntactically derived from the interaction of the Agree operation and a reformulated theory of phi-features. CCA of postnominal adjectives is analysed to be the result of post-syntactic relations, that is, linear adjacency.
Research underlying this work has been partly supported by grants EDU 2008-01268/EDUC and FFI2009-07114 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.
Peer reviewed
Agree, Grammar, Coordination, Number, Adjectival agreement, Partial agreement, Closest conjunct agreement, Phi-feature, Indo-european languages
Agree, Grammar, Coordination, Number, Adjectival agreement, Partial agreement, Closest conjunct agreement, Phi-feature, Indo-european languages
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
