
handle: 10261/385540
Double-cropping is an interesting diversification strategy to increase profitability and sustainability. Besides, by including legumes, it may reduce the N inputs dependency. However, its management with flood irrigation can be challenging. The was the evaluation of the impact of two double-cropping and different nitrogen (N) rates on productivity and N dynamics under flood irrigation. Two double-cropping (barley-maize; pea-maize) and three N rates (unfertilized, 0N; medium: MN; high rate, HN) were evaluated in a field experiment located in NE Spain during two years. In barley-maize, N rates were 0, 125 and 250 kg N ha−1, and 0, 200 and 400 kg N ha−1 for barley and maize phases, respectively. In pea-maize, pea did not receive N, and the MN and HN rates in the maize were reduced (150 and 350 kg N ha−1, respectively). Crop productivity and N uptake were evaluated. The economic return and N use efficiency (NUE) were calculated. Soil inorganic N (Nmin) was measured after harvest. The pea-maize double-cropping allowed the saving of N fertilizer without yield penalties. Besides, a pre-crop effect of pea in the maize yield was observed. Regarding the cropping system, pea-maize obtained a higher economic return the first year. Besides, the economic return was higher the first year, due to crop penalties. In general, NUE was greater in 0N, and no differences were observed between fertilized treatments. Soil Nmin after pea/barley was higher the first year, coincident with a higher productivity. After maize harvest, the barley-maize led to larger residual Nmin. Therefore, in this study, pea-maize allowed a reduction in the N rate, showed greater potential to increase the economic return and reduced the N leaching risk. However, crop yield penalties associated with flood-irrigation, indicate that farmers should be aware of facing a more challenging management or consider other irrigation method to ensure profitability.
9 Pags.- 7 Figs.- 3 Tabls. Data availability: Data will be made available on request. © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
This work was supported by the European Commission Horizon 2020 project Diverfarming [grant agreement 728003].
Peer reviewed
Corn, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, Agriculture (General), legumes, cereal crops, irrigated farming, maize, N fertilization, S1-972, Legume, NUE, nitrogen fertilizers, Diversification, Economic return, TX341-641
Corn, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, Agriculture (General), legumes, cereal crops, irrigated farming, maize, N fertilization, S1-972, Legume, NUE, nitrogen fertilizers, Diversification, Economic return, TX341-641
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
