Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1111/gcb.17312
pmid: 38736133
handle: 10261/373420 , 10651/74981 , 20.500.14243/470605 , 10138/576728 , 11454/104729 , 11436/9060 , 11343/351382
doi: 10.1111/gcb.17312
pmid: 38736133
handle: 10261/373420 , 10651/74981 , 20.500.14243/470605 , 10138/576728 , 11454/104729 , 11436/9060 , 11343/351382
AbstractBiological invasions pose a rapidly expanding threat to the persistence, functioning and service provisioning of ecosystems globally, and to socio‐economic interests. The stages of successful invasions are driven by the same mechanism that underlies adaptive changes across species in general—via natural selection on intraspecific variation in traits that influence survival and reproductive performance (i.e., fitness). Surprisingly, however, the rapid progress in the field of invasion science has resulted in a predominance of species‐level approaches (such as deny lists), often irrespective of natural selection theory, local adaptation and other population‐level processes that govern successful invasions. To address these issues, we analyse non‐native species dynamics at the population level by employing a database of European freshwater macroinvertebrate time series, to investigate spreading speed, abundance dynamics and impact assessments among populations. Our findings reveal substantial variability in spreading speed and abundance trends within and between macroinvertebrate species across biogeographic regions, indicating that levels of invasiveness and impact differ markedly. Discrepancies and inconsistencies among species‐level risk screenings and real population‐level data were also identified, highlighting the inherent challenges in accurately assessing population‐level effects through species‐level assessments. In recognition of the importance of population‐level assessments, we urge a shift in invasive species management frameworks, which should account for the dynamics of different populations and their environmental context. Adopting an adaptive, region‐specific and population‐focused approach is imperative, considering the diverse ecological contexts and varying degrees of susceptibility. Such an approach could improve and refine risk assessments while promoting mechanistic understandings of risks and impacts, thereby enabling the development of more effective conservation and management strategies.
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2306, 570, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2304, Freshwater Macroinvertebrates, Non-Native Species, long-term trends, Population Dynamics, Non-native species, 577, Fresh Water, Risk Assessments, Population Spread, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2300; name=General Environmental Science, Population-Level Dynamics, name=Ecology, Population spread, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2303; name=Ecology, Animals, name=General Environmental Science, non‐native species, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2303, population-level dynamics, risk assessments, Ecosystem, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2300, name=Global and Planetary Change, population‐level dynamics, Freshwater macroinvertebrates, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2306; name=Global and Planetary Change, non-native species, Long-term trends, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2304; name=Environmental Chemistry, Invertebrates, long‐term trends, name=Environmental Chemistry, [SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, Europe, Risk assessments, Ecology, evolutionary biology, Population-level dynamics, Long-Term Trends, [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, Introduced Species, population spread, freshwater macroinvertebrates
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2306, 570, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2304, Freshwater Macroinvertebrates, Non-Native Species, long-term trends, Population Dynamics, Non-native species, 577, Fresh Water, Risk Assessments, Population Spread, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2300; name=General Environmental Science, Population-Level Dynamics, name=Ecology, Population spread, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2303; name=Ecology, Animals, name=General Environmental Science, non‐native species, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2303, population-level dynamics, risk assessments, Ecosystem, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2300, name=Global and Planetary Change, population‐level dynamics, Freshwater macroinvertebrates, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2306; name=Global and Planetary Change, non-native species, Long-term trends, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2304; name=Environmental Chemistry, Invertebrates, long‐term trends, name=Environmental Chemistry, [SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, Europe, Risk assessments, Ecology, evolutionary biology, Population-level dynamics, Long-Term Trends, [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, Introduced Species, population spread, freshwater macroinvertebrates
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 59 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 78 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts