
Agricultural expansion and intensification have boosted global food production but have come at the cost of environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. Biodiversity-friendly farming that boosts ecosystem services, such as pollination and natural pest control, is widely being advocated to maintain and improve agricultural productivity while safeguarding biodiversity. A vast body of evidence showing the agronomic benefits of enhanced ecosystem service delivery represent important incentives to adopt practices enhancing biodiversity. However, the costs of biodiversity-friendly management are rarely taken into account and may represent a major barrier impeding uptake by farmers. Whether and how biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service delivery, and farm profit can go hand in hand is unknown. Here, we quantify the ecological, agronomic, and net economic benefits of biodiversity-friendly farming in an intensive grassland–sunflower system in Southwest France. We found that reducing land-use intensity on agricultural grasslands drastically enhances flower availability and wild bee diversity, including rare species. Biodiversity-friendly management on grasslands furthermore resulted in an up to 17% higher revenue on neighboring sunflower fields through positive effects on pollination service delivery. However, the opportunity costs of reduced grassland forage yields consistently exceeded the economic benefits of enhanced sunflower pollination. Our results highlight that profitability is often a key constraint hampering adoption of biodiversity-based farming and uptake critically depends on society’s willingness to pay for associated delivery of public goods such as biodiversity.
JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q1 - Agriculture/Q.Q1.Q19 - Other, agroecology, Land-use intensity, Crops, Agricultural, 570, Conservation of Natural Resources, Farms, Biodiversity-friendly farming, wild bees, 630, biodiversity-friendly farming, Ecosystem services, Animals, [SDV.SA.AEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, land-use intensity, Pollination, economy and politics, Ecosystem, [SDV.SA.AEP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, Agriculture, Biodiversity, Biological Sciences, Bees, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services • Biodiversity Conservation • Bioeconomics • Industrial Ecology, [SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, Wild bees, [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, ecosystem services, Agroecology
JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q1 - Agriculture/Q.Q1.Q19 - Other, agroecology, Land-use intensity, Crops, Agricultural, 570, Conservation of Natural Resources, Farms, Biodiversity-friendly farming, wild bees, 630, biodiversity-friendly farming, Ecosystem services, Animals, [SDV.SA.AEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, land-use intensity, Pollination, economy and politics, Ecosystem, [SDV.SA.AEP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Agriculture, economy and politics, Agriculture, Biodiversity, Biological Sciences, Bees, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services • Biodiversity Conservation • Bioeconomics • Industrial Ecology, [SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, Wild bees, [SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, ecosystem services, Agroecology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
