Downloads provided by UsageCounts
AbstractThe bioethics research conducted in Ibero‐American countries has been very much restricted to its own realm.The aim of this study was to perform a bibliometric evaluation of bioethics papers by authors affiliated with Ibero‐American institutions, and to determine how their work influences global bioethics literature.We performed a literature search in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) and Scopus.We identified a total of 5,975 documents, of which 84.3% were articles, 11.6% reviews and 4.1% book chapters. The median number of citations per paper was higher in English‐language journals.Only 10 articles published between 2010 and 2019 in peer‐reviewed bioethics journals and produced exclusively by authors from Ibero‐American institutions garnered more than 15 citations.Our study suggests that if researchers from Ibero‐American institutions want to influence global bioethical thinking, they must make the required leap in quality to be able to publish in high‐quality bioethics and mainstream journals.
groups), position statements (of organizations, research on special populations, Special populations, Bioethics, position statements on professional ethics, Scientific research, Research Personnel, United States, Professional ethics, 32 Ciencias Médicas, Bibliometrics, scientific research, Humans, codes of, 71 Ética, Position statements
groups), position statements (of organizations, research on special populations, Special populations, Bioethics, position statements on professional ethics, Scientific research, Research Personnel, United States, Professional ethics, 32 Ciencias Médicas, Bibliometrics, scientific research, Humans, codes of, 71 Ética, Position statements
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 198 | |
| downloads | 141 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts