Views provided by UsageCounts
Abstract BACKGROUND The European Pesticide Regulation ( EC ) No. 1107/2009 encourages the use of less harmful active substances. Two main concerns involve the application of cut‐off criteria for pesticides without losing tools for future agriculture (especially for minor uses) and the implementation of zonal evaluations. Biopesticides are considered to have lower risks than synthetic pesticides; consequently, there is strong interest for their use in integrated pest management practices . RESULTS This paper provides an analysis of the current European situation, starting with the first attempts to regulate the use of plant protection products and focusing on the implications of the new legislative criteria for biopesticides . CONCLUSION It is important to be aware that biopesticides are still pesticides and fall under the same regulations as their synthetic counterparts. Although manufacturers are still reluctant to commit to such alternatives due to difficulties with approval and registration, biopesticides could be alternatives for traditional plant protection products, either as a base for the synthesis of new products or integrated with traditional plant protection products. In addition, biopesticides have to be used only as indicated on the label, which provides critical information about how to safely handle and use plant protection products. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry
Biopesticides, Cut-off criteria, European Regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009, Integrated pest management, Agriculture, Europe, Pest Control, Biological, Plant Diseases
Biopesticides, Cut-off criteria, European Regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009, Integrated pest management, Agriculture, Europe, Pest Control, Biological, Plant Diseases
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 150 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 42 |

Views provided by UsageCounts