Views provided by UsageCounts
This article analyses the willingness to pay for a program that promotes the production of electricity from forest biomass, instead of that based on fossil fuels. The program decreases greenhouse gas emissions, reduces the pressure on non-renewable resources, lowers the risk of summer forest fires, creates employment in rural areas. Results from a choice experiment show that consumers are willing to pay a higher price for electricity in order to obtain the external benefits of the substitution. Respondents attach a higher value to programs that decrease the pressure of non-renewable resources and the risk of forest fires.
Risk, Rural Population, Energy-Generating Resources, Fossil Fuels, Decision Making, Conservation of Energy Resources, Trees, Choice experiment, Non-market valuation, Models, Economic, Electricity, Spain, Public Opinion, Humans, Biomass, Biotechnology
Risk, Rural Population, Energy-Generating Resources, Fossil Fuels, Decision Making, Conservation of Energy Resources, Trees, Choice experiment, Non-market valuation, Models, Economic, Electricity, Spain, Public Opinion, Humans, Biomass, Biotechnology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 33 |

Views provided by UsageCounts