Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Meat Science
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Meat Science
Article . 2012
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Carcass classification in suckling lambs. II. Comparison among subjective carcass classification methods: fatness scales and conformation scales with 0.25 point-intervals

Authors: Ruiz de Huidobro, F.; Miguel, E.; Díaz, M. T.; Velasco, S.; Lauzurica, S.; Pérez, C.; Onega, E.; +2 Authors

Carcass classification in suckling lambs. II. Comparison among subjective carcass classification methods: fatness scales and conformation scales with 0.25 point-intervals

Abstract

Forty-nine Manchega breed suckling lambs were used. Carcass weight was less than 13 kg, and lambs were slaughtered at 10, 12 and 14 kg liveweight. Carcasses were classified by three assessors on colour photographs, by several classification methods: the European Union scale for light lambs carcasses (EU), Colomer-Rocher methods for fatness (CF) and conformation (CC), and the new scale for suckling lambs (SL) developed by our research group. Carcasses were also assessed using these scales divided into 0.25 point-intervals (EU-25, CF-25, CC-25 and SL-25). A correlation analysis was made between assessors score and tissue composition in the carcass and in three joints (leg, best end of neck and loin, and shoulder). For all the methods studied 0.25 point scales were best correlated to tissue composition than 1.0 points-interval scales. When 1.0 point-interval scales were used the SL scale was best correlated to tissue composition. When 0.25 point-scales were used, the EU scale gave the best correlations. Conformation scale (CC) was useful to predict carcass composition, specially kidney knob and channel fat content.

Keywords

Sheep, Lamb, Tissue composition, Carcass, Carcass classification

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 46
  • 46
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
19
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
46
Green