Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/291406
AbstractLaboratory experiments were conducted to study the effects of various trapping and endoparasitic nematophagous fungi (NF) isolated from Florida citrus orchards on five entomopathogenic nematode (EPN) species that show various distributions across Florida's citrus industry. Four trapping NF (Arthrobotrys oligospora, A. dactyloides, A. musiformis and Gamsylella gephyropaga) and two endoparasitic NF (Catenaria sp. and Myzocytium sp.) were tested against Steinernema diaprepesi (Sd), S. glaseri (Sg), S. riobrave (Sr), Heterorhabditis zealandica (Hz) and H. indica (Hi). Fungi were added to soil microcosms either as a pure culture on agar plugs (trapping NF) or as fungal-colonised nematodes (endoparasitic NF) on agar plugs, concurrently with 2000 EPN of a given species. After 7 or 14 days exposure, nematodes were recovered from the soil using Baermann funnels. The recovery of all EPN species was reduced between 56-92% by G. gephyropaga. Neither Sd or Sg were affected by any species of Arthrobotrys, whereas A. musiformis reduced recovery of all other EPN and A. oligospora reduced numbers of all other species except Hi. Both endoparasitic NF reduced the recovery of all EPN except Hi by at least 82%. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that NF may play a role in regulating regional patterns of abundance and diversity of EPN species in Florida, which in turn regulate the abundance of a major citrus pest, the Diaprepes root weevil, Diaprepes abbreviatus.
Antagonism, Hyperparasitism, Biological control, Natural control, Predation, Tri-trophic interaction, Suppressiveness
Antagonism, Hyperparasitism, Biological control, Natural control, Predation, Tri-trophic interaction, Suppressiveness
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 35 |

Views provided by UsageCounts