Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Livestock Science
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2023
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Reducing antibiotic use: Selective metaphylaxis with florfenicol in commercial feedlots

Authors: Gonzalez-Martin, Juan Vicente; Elvira Partida, Laura; Cerviño, Manuel; Pérez-Villalobos, Natividad; Calvo López-Guerrero, E.; Astiz, Susana;

Reducing antibiotic use: Selective metaphylaxis with florfenicol in commercial feedlots

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is the main disease in beef production. Mass antibiotic treatment of high-risk calves at feedlot entry, a practice called metaphylaxis, is one of the most common tools to fight this disease. However, there is a growing tendency to minimize the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals.To develop a clinically based use of antibiotics, two experiments evaluated selective metaphylaxis with florfenicol (Nuflor®, Intervet-Schering-Plough S.A.;Boxmeer, Holland) administered to calves with a rectal temperature ≥ 39.7. °C (HT-calves).In the first experiment, 287 calves at high risk for BRD were randomly allocated to one of four experimental groups in a multi-site study HT-calves with florfenicol metaphylaxis (FHT), HT-calves without metaphylaxis (CHT), calves with a rectal temperature < 39.7. °C (LT-calves) with florfenicol metaphylaxis (FLT), and LT-calves without metaphylaxis (CLT). BRD incidence, average daily weight gain (ADG) and feed intake were recorded for 30 days. Respiratory symptoms were recorded in control calves to identify possible criteria to guide selective metaphylaxis.In the second experiment, 114 high-risk calves were randomly allocated to two groups in the FSM group, selective metaphylaxis with florfenicol. 33Nuflor®, Intervet Schering-Plough AH. was carried out in calves with a rectal temperature ≥ 39.7. °C (10/57 calves, 17.5%); in the TMM group, mass metaphylaxis with tulathromycine. 44Draxxin®, Pfizer AH. was carried out on all calves. BRD incidence, ADG, feed conversion, dressing percentage and lung lesions were monitored until slaughter. In the first experiment, we found no significant difference between FLT and CLT calves in BRD incidence (21.4% vs. 27.7%; P = 0.33) or ADG (1.16 vs. 1.21 kg/day; P = 0.46), or between FHT and CHT calves in BRD incidence (36.6% vs. 52.6; P = 0.24) or ADG (1.02 vs. 0.99; P = 0.83). Of all the clinical characteristics measured, only rectal temperature ≥ 39.7. °C was found to be significantly useful (P = 0.02) as a selection criterion for metaphylaxis.In the second experiment, no significant differences were found between FSM and TMM groups in BRD incidence (24.6 vs. 28.1%; P = 0.67), ADG (1.29 ± 0.17 vs. 1.34 ± 0.18 kg/day; P = 0.57), feed conversion (5.35 ± 0.36 vs. 5.34 ± 0.27 kg; P = 0.96), dressing percentage (48.61 vs. 49.30%; P = 0.19), or lung lesions (38.6 vs. 36.4%; P = 0.83). In addition, no BRD-associated mortality was observed, and only 1.69% of TMM calves developed chronic disease.Under our study conditions, selective metaphylaxis with florfenicol based on rectal temperature was associated with lower drug-related costs, less antibiotic use, and less intensive handling of calves than was mass metaphylaxis. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
Keywords

Reduced antibiotic use, Bovine respiratory disease, Florfenicol, Metaphylactic use, Beef

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    22
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 58
  • 58
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
22
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
58
Green