Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ABACUS. Repositorio ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Livestock Science
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Reproductive strategies for dairy heifers based on 5d-Cosynch with or without an intravaginal progesterone device and observed estrus

Authors: Pau Pallares; Aitor Fernandez-Novo; Javier Heras; Jose Luis Pesantez-Pacheco; Ana Heras-Molina; Natividad Perez-Villalobos; Susana Astiz;

Reproductive strategies for dairy heifers based on 5d-Cosynch with or without an intravaginal progesterone device and observed estrus

Abstract

The objective of this randomized, controlled study was to evaluate the reproductive and economic performance of dairy Holstein heifers managed for first to third artificial inseminations (AIs) with or without an intravaginal progesterone device (IPD) under different temperature-humidity indexes (THI) and combined with AI after observed estrus. A total of 503 heifers from one rearing commercial farm were randomly assigned for first AI to the 5d Co-synch 72 h protocol (5dCO; n=261) or to the 5d Co-synch protocol plus IPD (5dCOP4; n=242). In a subset of heifers (n = 193) we determined progesterone (p4) and performed an ovarian ultrasound scanner on Days 0, 5, 8 and 15. Animals were considered to be synchronized on Day 5 if p4 > 1 ng/mL and a corpus luteum present; synchronized on Day 8 if p4 8 mm diameter was observed; and synchronized on Day 15 if p4 > 1 ng/mL and ovulation occurred, defined as the presence of a CL in the ovary where a follicle had been detected on Day 8. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by ultrasound scanner on Days 28-35 after AI. The diagnosis confirmation was done by ultrasound on Days 50-56 and again on Days 100-113 after AI. Non-pregnant heifers (n=205) were resynchronized with the same protocol for second fixed-time AI (FTAI) and 104 for third FTAI. Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) and pregnancy loss after each AI were calculated. Reproductive costs were calculated at the individual level, based on costs for pregnancy and cost for the open days. Estrus observation was performed by visual inspection for 20 min periods, twice a day and heifers observed in estrus inseminated (OEAI). Observed in estrus inseminated heifers were 10.5% at first, 26.8% at second and 24.0% at third AI (P >0.05). The global P/AI after first AI was 58.6%; the P/AI after FTAI, 58.0%; and the P/AI after first OEAIs, 64.2%. Pregnancy per AI values were better in the IPD group [55.2% for 5dCO vs. 62.4% for 5dCOP4; odds ratio (OR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.70; P=0.003], and a significant effect of the temperature humidity index (THI) on P/AI was observed (P = 0.03). The protocol 5dCOP4 led to a significantly better synchronization rate (85.7% vs. 40.0% for 5dCO; P = 0.01) and a numerically higher P/AI (74.5% vs. 49.0% for 5dCO; P = 0.24) when THI values were ≥ 70. During the cold season, there were no differences between the experimental groups for the synchronization rate (P = 0.9) nor for the P/AI (P = 0.6). The P/AI was 52.2% after the second AI and 60.6% after the third AI. Inseminations per pregnancy and open days did not differ significantly across experimental groups. However, reproduction costs per heifer were 130.8 ± 116.1 and 152.3 ± 129.5€ for 5dCO and 5dCOP4 groups, respectively, for the whole study (P = 0.051) and the average cost per AI was 58.23 ± 27.9 € for 5dCO and 76.3 ± 36.2 € for 5dCOP4 (P < 0.0001). During the cold season, protocols were associated with similar costs to the whole study, but they differed notably during the hot season (194.3 ± 137.6 vs. 177.3 ± 134.2 for 5dCO and 5dCOP4, respectively; P=0.49), reflecting the better reproductive performance with an IPD during the summer (P = 0.003). Advisors and farmers need to consider farm conditions and characteristics (herd management, staff training, and seasonality, among others) to achieve the best economic and reproductive performance in the dairy herds, when implementing hormonal synchronization protocols. Thus, cost-effectiveness depends on seasonality when implementing reproductive strategies with 5 d Co-synch 72h and combined OEAI at a rearing farm. With high THI-values, the inclusion of IPD in hormonal protocols in heifers is recommended, while it is not required during the cool season.

VIRBAC España SA (Barcelona, Spain) funded hormonal treatments.

11 Pág. Departamento de Reproducción Animal

Peer reviewed

Country
Spain
Keywords

600, Economía agraria, Fecundidad, Synchronization, Dairy heifer, 630, Insemination, Pregnancy cost, Reproductive strategie, Ganado vacuno, Medicina veterinaria

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 48
    download downloads 34
  • 48
    views
    34
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
48
34
Green