Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/223761
The aim of the present work was to compare the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of untreated olive mill solid waste (OMSW), soft hydrothermal pre-treated OMSW (SHP OMSW), and a co-digestion mixture of 95% OMSW and 5% microalga Dunaliella salina (co-OMSW). During the co-digestion experiment, the volatile fatty acid accumulation decreased in comparison with that obtained for OMSW and SHP OMSW, reducing the slight inhibition observed during the OMSW and SHP OMSW experiments. Final values of methane yield of 380 ± 1 mL CH4 g−1 VSadded for the OMSW, 424 ± 2 mL CH4 g−1 VSadded for the SHP OMSW, and 491 ± 1 mL CH4 g−1 VSadded for the co-OMSW were determined. Two mathematical models, first-order kinetics and modified Gompertz model, were employed to fit the experimental data with the aim of elucidating the anaerobic biodegradation and obtain the kinetic constants. Both models allowed for adequately fitting the experimental results of methane production with time. The kinetic constant, k, of the first-order model increased by 12% for the co-OMSW compared with the values achieved for OMSW and SHP OMSW. The modified Gompertz model revealed that the maximum methane production rate, Rm, for the co-OMSW and SHP OMSW increased by 34.7% and 10.3% compared with the value obtained for OMSW.
This study was funded by: - The Project of Excellence RNM-1970 funded by the regional government of Andalucía, Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Economía, Innovación, Ciencia y Empleo, Andalucía, Spain. - The Ramón y Cajal Program (RYC-2011-08783 contract) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, providing financial support to Dr. Rincón.
4 Tablas.-- 3 Figuras
Peer reviewed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 46 | |
| downloads | 142 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts