Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10230/60031 , 10261/218843 , 10256/18474
Abstract Coordinated distributed experiments (CDEs) enable the study of large-scale ecological patterns in geographically dispersed areas, while simultaneously providing broad academic and personal benefits for the participants. However, the effective involvement of early-career researchers (ECRs) presents major challenges. Here, we analyze the benefits and challenges of the first CDE exclusively led and conducted by ECRs (i.e. ECR-CDE), which sets a baseline for similar CDEs, and we provide recommendations for successful CDE execution. ECR-CDEs achieve most of the outcomes identified in conventional CDEs as well as extensive benefits for the young cohort of researchers, including: (i) receiving scientific credit, (ii) peer-training in new concepts and methods, (iii) developing leadership and communication skills, (iv) promoting a peer network among ECRs, and (v) building on individual engagement and independence. We also discuss the challenges of ECR-CDEs, which are mainly derived from the lack of independence and instability of the participants, and we suggest mechanisms to address them, such as resource re-allocation and communication strategies.
early-career researchers, Coordinated distributed experiment, networking, Education (General), Collaboration, collaboration, Biotic communities -- Learning, Education, Ecosistemes -- Aprenentatge, Peer-learning, Networking, peer-learning, Early-career researchers, coordinated distributed experiment, L7-991
early-career researchers, Coordinated distributed experiment, networking, Education (General), Collaboration, collaboration, Biotic communities -- Learning, Education, Ecosistemes -- Aprenentatge, Peer-learning, Networking, peer-learning, Early-career researchers, coordinated distributed experiment, L7-991
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 104 | |
| downloads | 136 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts