Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/20107
This article reviews the most relevant analytical methods for resin acids (RAs) in process waters and effluents from pulp and paper mills. These compounds, originating in the wood material, are relevant, since they are dissolved and dispersed in process waters of the mills, causing machinery failures, reducing the quality of the final product, and generating environmental problems in the aquatic system when released as effluent. Analysis of RAs is usually undertaken by gas chromatography (GC) coupled to flame ionisation detection (FID), electron capture detection (ECD) or mass spectrometry (MS), following derivatisation. However, alternative methods using liquid chromatography (LC) or capillary electrophoresis (CE) have emerged recently. The advantages and disadvantages of the various methodologies, including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), are also discussed.
This study has been supported by the EU Energy, Environmental and Sustainable Development Program (CLOSEDCYCLE, Contract No EVK1-2000-00749) and Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, Spain (PPQ2000-3007-CE).
12 pages, 3 figures, 4 tables.-- Available online Dec 2, 2003.
Peer reviewed
Effluent, Toxicity, Analytical methods, Process water, Resin acids, Paper mill
Effluent, Toxicity, Analytical methods, Process water, Resin acids, Paper mill
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 51 |

Views provided by UsageCounts