Views provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1007/bf02497486
handle: 10261/19932
Samples (200 mL) were extracted using off-line SPE with polymeric OASIS 60 mg cartridges. Analyses were performed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using selected ion monitoring (SIM) and full scan for quantification and unequivocal identification, respectively. This paper reports the detection limit for the compounds studied (from 0.001 to 0.030 μg L−1), and method performance as regards to linearity (0.01–1.3 μg L−1), reproducibility (less than 9%) and recovery (84 to 95%).
Active endocrine disruptors (nonylphenol, octylphenol and bisphenol A) were analysed in 2 aquifers and the corresponding surface waters. They are compounds widely used in industrial processes. The objective of this study was to determine the leaching potential of these compounds in groundwaters and to eventually correlate these levels with surface water samples. The areas sampled were agricultural, close to large cities and with an important industrial activity in the surrounding area.
The results from a monitoring program revealed the presence of the target compounds in all samples analysed, at levels of 0.07 and 1.9 μg L−1. The presence of these compounds in groundwater was attributed basically to degradation of inert ingredients present in the formulation of many pesticides or to the increasing application of sludge in agricultural practice, although the infiltration of industrial run-off and wastewater disposal cannot be disregarded.
This work was financed by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (PPQ2001-1805-C03-01).
6 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables.-- Available online Oct 12, 2006.
Peer reviewed
Solid-phase extraction, Alkyl phenols, Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, Groundwater samples, Endocrine disruptors
Solid-phase extraction, Alkyl phenols, Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, Groundwater samples, Endocrine disruptors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 67 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 41 |

Views provided by UsageCounts