Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.3989/gya.0446171
handle: 11441/96193 , 10261/156182
The definitions of olive oil categories are common or very similar for all the international regulatory bodies, and in many cases the text is even literally the same. However, the values of some parameters which chemically define the different categories do not have the same degree of agreement. These disagreements mean a difficult task for importers and exporters who have to deal with these differences when they need to defend the quality and genuineness of their product. This work analyzes the differences found when scrutinizing the current trade standards and regulations from a critical viewpoint, with comments and useful tips for improving the current International Olive Council methods when possible, as well as alternatives from non targeted techniques. The values of precision associated with the International Olive Council methods are also examined and the need for re-validating methods to update the analytical quality parameters is discussed.
validation, Métodos analíticos, Validación, International trade standards, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, international trade standards, olive oil, Aceite de oliva, International trade standards ; Validation ; Analytical methods ; Olive oil, analytical methods, Analytical methods, Validation, TX341-641, Normas comerciales internacionales, Olive oil
validation, Métodos analíticos, Validación, International trade standards, Nutrition. Foods and food supply, international trade standards, olive oil, Aceite de oliva, International trade standards ; Validation ; Analytical methods ; Olive oil, analytical methods, Analytical methods, Validation, TX341-641, Normas comerciales internacionales, Olive oil
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 61 | |
| downloads | 207 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts