Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/147620
Two bituminous coals of different rank and coking characteristics were oxidized at low temperature for two months. Bituminous additives obtained in-situ in the coking plant were used to improve the thermoplastic properties of the oxidized coals. The Gieseler fluidity test was applied to evaluate their coking properties. A thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the fresh, oxidized coals and their blends with the bituminous additives was carried in order to evaluate the interaction between the blend components. In addition, carbonization tests of the fresh and oxidized coals and the blends with the additives were carried out in a movable wall oven of 17 kg capacity and the quality of the cokes tested by means of standardized methods generally used by the steel industry. The additives increased coal fluidity but the original fluidity values could not be recovered. From TGA it was concluded that the blend components behave independently of one another during co-carbonization. The oxidation of coal leads to an increase in the dangerousness of the low volatile coal which was related to the porous texture of the cokes. In addition, it was found that the decrease in the quality of the coke produced from low rank oxidized coal can be partially recovered by using bituminous additives.
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Research Programme of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (RFCS) research programme under grant agreement No. RFCR-CT-2013-00007.
Peer reviewed
Coal oxidation, Additives, Coking pressure, Coke
Coal oxidation, Additives, Coking pressure, Coke
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 55 | |
| downloads | 118 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts