Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/125257
Starch suspensions (30%), from pea and corn samples, with amylose (AML) contents ranging from 28% to 75%, were pressurized between 150 and 650 MPa for 30 min at room temperature. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), assisted by thermo-optical polarized microscopy (TPM) and X-ray diffractometry (XRD), was used to demonstrate the difference between pressure-gelatinization and heat gelatinization. The higher amylose content made the starch more resistant to pressure-induced gelatinization. Normal corn (28% AML) and pea starches (35% AML) partially gelatinized at 400 MPa and up, however pressurization produced low-quality gels with granular structure. Conversely, high amylose corn starches (55% and 70% AML) did not gelatinize at all (even at 650 MPa), although the starch suspensions underwent slight increases in viscosity. Retrogradation occurred either concurrently or immediately after pressurization as opposed to long-term thermal retrogradation. XRD revealed that a second scan produced vitrification and possible resistant starch formation in gelatinized/gelled starches. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Partial funding from CICYT (Project MAT2004-00496) is acknowledged
Peer Reviewed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 15 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts