Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella spp. has been approached by a new multiplex PCR-based procedure followed by capillary gel electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection (multiplex-PCR-CGE-LIF). As compared to slab gel electrophoresis, the use of CGE-LIF improved from 10- to 1000-fold the sensitivity of the multiplex PCR analysis, allowing the detection of 2.6 x 10(3) cfu mL(-1) of S. aureus, 570 cfu mL(-1) of L. monocytogenes, and 790 cfu mL(-1) of Salmonella in artificially inoculated food, without enrichment. Following 6 h of enrichment, as low as 260, 79, and 57 cfu mL(-1) of S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and Salmonella, respectively, were detected. The CGE-LIF method is shown to be reproducible, providing relative standard deviation (RSD) values lower than 0.8% for analysis time and lower than 5.8% for peak areas. The multiplex-PCR-CGE-LIF proved a powerful analytical tool to detect various food pathogens simultaneously in a fast, reproducible, and sensitive way.
Staphylococcus aureus, LIF, food analysis, Food analysis, Lasers, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Reproducibility of Results, Multiplex PCR, Listeria monocytogenes, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sensitivity and Specificity, Fluorescence, Salmonella, Salmonella spp., Food Microbiology, DNA analysis, CGE, foodborne pathogens
Staphylococcus aureus, LIF, food analysis, Food analysis, Lasers, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Reproducibility of Results, Multiplex PCR, Listeria monocytogenes, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sensitivity and Specificity, Fluorescence, Salmonella, Salmonella spp., Food Microbiology, DNA analysis, CGE, foodborne pathogens
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 59 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 25 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts