Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1002/cplx.21436
handle: 2117/18405 , 10261/115786
AbstractTechnological evolution has been compared to biological evolution by many authors over the last two centuries. As a parallel experiment of innovation involving economic, historical, and social components, artifacts define a universe of evolving properties that displays episodes of diversification and extinction. Here, we critically review previous work comparing the two types of evolution. Like biological evolution, technological evolution is driven by descent with variation and selection, and includes tinkering, convergence, and contingency. At the same time, there are essential differences that make the two types of evolution quite distinct. Major distinctions are illustrated by current specific examples, including the evolution of cornets and the historical dynamics of information technologies. Due to their fast and rich development, the later provide a unique opportunity to study technological evolution at all scales with unprecedented resolution. Despite the presence of patterns suggesting convergent trends between man‐made systems end biological ones, they provide examples of planned design that have no equivalent with natural evolution.
Technology, Culturomics, Evolution, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Desenvolupament humà i sostenible::Medi ambient::Ecologia, Innovacions tecnològiques -- Aspectes ambientals, Information technology, :Desenvolupament humà i sostenible::Medi ambient::Ecologia [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Tinkering, Information technologies, Technological innovations -- Environmental aspects, Convergence
Technology, Culturomics, Evolution, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Desenvolupament humà i sostenible::Medi ambient::Ecologia, Innovacions tecnològiques -- Aspectes ambientals, Information technology, :Desenvolupament humà i sostenible::Medi ambient::Ecologia [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Tinkering, Information technologies, Technological innovations -- Environmental aspects, Convergence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 99 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 103 | |
| downloads | 586 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts