Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/11238
The authors regret that an error in the calculation of rhizome biomass per square meter led to a series of errors in Table 2 (variables affected: rhizome biomass, total biomass, rhizome + roots to shoot biomass ratio) and Table 3 (variables affected: total biomass, rhizome + roots to shoot biomass ratio). They are reproduced correctly in the corrigendum. These changes do not alter the conclusions greatly for the error affected equally the three reefs studied.
2 pages.-- Available online May 30, 2008.-- Refers to: "State of Thalassia testudinum Banks ex König meadows in the Veracruz Reef System, Veracruz, México" (Aquatic Botany 88(1): 17-26 (Jan 2008)), http://digital.csic.es/handle/10261/11240
Peer reviewed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 57 |

Views provided by UsageCounts