Downloads provided by UsageCounts
AbstractBACKGROUNDTo identify genotypes with good organoleptic properties, antioxidant‐rich content and low susceptibility to chilling injury (CI), fruits from 130 peach cultivars were studied over three consecutive years. Pomological traits, l‐ascorbic acid, flavonoids, total phenolics, relative antioxidant capacity (RAC) and sugars were determined. Major symptoms of CI developed at 5 °C, such as leatheriness, flesh browning, bleeding and loss of flavor, were evaluated.RESULTSThe population exhibited wide phenotypic variation in agronomic and biochemical traits. Six genotypes with high total phenolics, RAC, flavonoids and total sugars were selected. The progeny also showed variability for all evaluated CI symptoms, and 16 genotypes showed considerably lower susceptibility to CI. After 2 weeks of cold storage, leatheriness and bleeding were the main CI symptoms observed, whereas flesh browning was predominant after 4 weeks.CONCLUSIONIt was possible to find varieties with high phenolic concentration and relatively low or intermediate CI susceptibility (22, 33, 68, 80, 81, 96 and 120). However, the correlations observed between CI and phenolic contents highlight their potential influence on susceptibility to internal browning. This relationship should be considered in the current breeding programs to select cultivars with high bioactive compound contents, health‐enhancing properties and good postharvest performance. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry
Total phenolics, Genotype, Carbohydrates, Ascorbic Acid, Breeding, Antioxidants, Phenols, Humans, Vitamin C, Flavonoids, Chilling injury, Antioxidant capacity, Cold Temperature, Phenotype, Food Storage, Fruit, Postharvest disorders, Prunus, Sugars
Total phenolics, Genotype, Carbohydrates, Ascorbic Acid, Breeding, Antioxidants, Phenols, Humans, Vitamin C, Flavonoids, Chilling injury, Antioxidant capacity, Cold Temperature, Phenotype, Food Storage, Fruit, Postharvest disorders, Prunus, Sugars
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 60 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 61 | |
| downloads | 187 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts