Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Estereotipos de género y sexismo ambivalente

Authors: Rodríguez Azorín, Sara;

Estereotipos de género y sexismo ambivalente

Abstract

En la actualidad todavía existen actitudes discriminatorias hacia las mujeres y muchas veces tienen un carácter encubierto y sutil y pasan, por tanto, más inadvertidas, pero continúan implicando un tratamiento desigual y perjudicial hacia las mujeres. Dos de los factores implicados en estos comportamientos es la percepción sobre cómo son típicamente las mujeres y los hombres y las actitudes sexistas. En este marco, planteamos el presente estudio que tiene como objetivo analizar si existen actitudes sexistas y continúan presentes los estereotipos de género. Finalmente se pretende investigar si el sexismo hostil y benevolente está influenciado por la edad, el sexo, la pertenencia la colectivo LGTBI, la ideología política, el nivel de estudios y los estereotipos de género. Para ello, se ha contado con una muestra de 1044 personas (318 hombres y 726 mujeres). Los sujetos respondieron un cuestionario anónimo en el que aparece Escala de sexismo ambivalente (ASI, Glick & Fiske, 1996) y el Inventario de Roles Sexuales de Bem (BSRI, 1974). Los resultados indican que a la mujer típica, predominantemente, se le atribuyen más rasgos considerados estereotípicos femeninos, mientras que al hombre típico se le atribuyen más rasgos estereotípicos masculinos. El nivel de sexismo de la muestra es bajo, pero los hombres obtienen puntuaciones más elevadas que las mujeres. Además, encontramos que el sexo del participante, la pertenencia o no al colectivo LGTBI, el nivel de estudios, la edad, la ideología política y los estereotipos de genero influyen tanto en el sexismo hostil como en el sexismo benevolente. Estos resultados ponen de relieve el papel de los estereotipos de género en los procesos de percepción social y la formación de actitudes sexistas en nuestra sociedad.

Discriminatory attitudes towards women still exist today and are often covert and subtle in nature and thus go unnoticed, but continue to imply unequal and harmful treatment of women. Two of the factors involved in these behaviors is the perception of how they are typically women and men and sexist attitudes. In this framework, we propose the present study that aims to analyze whether there are sexist attitudes and gender stereotypes are still present. Finally, the aim is to investigate whether hostile and benevolent sexism is influenced by age, sex, membership of the LGTBI community, political ideology, educational level and gender stereotypes. For this, a sample of 1044 people (318 men and 726 women) was counted. The subjects answered an anonymous questionnaire in which the Ambivalent Sexism Scale (ASI, Glik & Fiske, 1996) and the Bem Sex Roles Inventory (BSRI, 1974) appear. The results indicate that the typical woman, predominantly, is attributed more traits considered stereotypical female, while the typical man is attributed more stereotypical male traits. The level of sexism in the sample is low, but men obtain higher scores than women. Furthermore, we found that the participant's gender, membership or not to the LGTBI collective, educational level, age, political ideology, and gender stereotypes influence both hostile sexism and benevolent sexism. These results highlight the role of gender western stereotypes in the processes of social perception and the formation of sexist attitudes in our society.

Treball Final de Grau en Psicologia. Codi: PS1048. Curs: 2020/2021

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
Keywords

stereotypes, Grau en Psicologia, Bachelor's Degree in Psychology, woman, gender, LGTBI, sexism, Grado en Psicología, discrimination

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 168
    download downloads 210
  • 168
    views
    210
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
168
210
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!