
handle: 10214/1982
While King Arthur provided the numerically largest bell pepper fruit yield, there was no statistically significant differences among the cultivars evaluated, except for Pro5 -C67 x 68, which produced the smallest yield. Trends for fruit number and early yield were similar (Table 2). Aristotle had the greatest fruit weight, while Pro5 -C67 x 68 had the greatest wall thickness (Table 2). Inferno produced the greatest fruit yield amoung the banana pepper varieties (Table 3). Total bacterial cluster counts recorded from inoculated plants were low in 2007; however the lowest total counts were found on Aristotle, Red Bull, Variety # 8620 , Pro3 -13x14R-4, and Pro5 -C67 x 68 (Figure 1). PX 11412119 had the fewest bacterial cluster counts amoung the banana pepper types (Figure 2). Eight bell pepper cultivars and seven hot banana pepper cultivars were included in the 2007 trial. Bell pepper transplants were produced by Demaiter Greenhouses, Thamesville, and seeded on 26 April; banana pepper transplants were provided by Smuckers. Mulch was layed on 08 June onto a Brookston clay loam sand spot phase soil on the Ridgetown Campus research farm. Peppers were transplanted on 13 June, 2007, using a Rainflo water wheel transplanter, with a row spacing of 1.5 m and in row spacing of 45 cm (29,630 plants/ha). There was a twin row of plants per bed, which were centered at 1.5 m. University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus
variety trial, Ontario Vegetable Crops Research, Ridgetown, yield, Xanthomonas campestris, capsicum annuum, variety, pepper, xanthomonas campestris, quality, bacterial spot, processing, cultivar
variety trial, Ontario Vegetable Crops Research, Ridgetown, yield, Xanthomonas campestris, capsicum annuum, variety, pepper, xanthomonas campestris, quality, bacterial spot, processing, cultivar
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
