
handle: 10197/1925
Participation rates in higher education differ persistently between some groups in society. Using two British datasets we investigate whether this gap is rooted in students' misperception of their own and other's ability, thereby increasing the expected costs to studying. Among high school pupils, we find that pupils with a more positive view of their academic abilities are more likely to expect to continue to higher education even after controlling for observable measures of ability and students' characteristics. University students are also poor at estimating their own test-performance and over-estimate their predicted test score. However, females, white and working class students have less inflated view of themselves. Self-perception has limited impact on the expected probability of success and expected returns amongst these university students.
Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
Not applicable
J16, Test performance; self-assessment; Higher education; Participation; Academic self-perception; Educational attainment; Students--Self-rating of, 370, Participation, self-assessment, Educational attainment, Y80, Test performance, Higher education, Test performance, self-assessment, higher education participation, academic selfperception, I21, Students--Self-rating of, Academic self-perception, jel: jel:I21, jel: jel:Y80, jel: jel:J16
J16, Test performance; self-assessment; Higher education; Participation; Academic self-perception; Educational attainment; Students--Self-rating of, 370, Participation, self-assessment, Educational attainment, Y80, Test performance, Higher education, Test performance, self-assessment, higher education participation, academic selfperception, I21, Students--Self-rating of, Academic self-perception, jel: jel:I21, jel: jel:Y80, jel: jel:J16
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
