
handle: 10171/40053
Este artículo pretende ser un comentario crítico a la segunda edición de la deducción trascendental. Se centra en la unidad del acto cognoscitivo según Kant, intentando dilucidar la suficiencia de tal unidad para el conocer. The aim of this paper is to develop a critical comment to B–Deduction of the Critique of Pure Reason. It focused on the unity of apperception, and tries to elucidate the sufficiency of such an unity for understanding.
Apercepción, Intellectual presence, Spontaneity, Materias Investigacion::Arte y Humanidades::Filosofía, Sujeto trascendental, Apperception, Transcendental subject, Presencia mental, :Arte y Humanidades::Filosofía [Materias Investigacion], Espontaneidad
Apercepción, Intellectual presence, Spontaneity, Materias Investigacion::Arte y Humanidades::Filosofía, Sujeto trascendental, Apperception, Transcendental subject, Presencia mental, :Arte y Humanidades::Filosofía [Materias Investigacion], Espontaneidad
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
