Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Should HECs assess whether 'clear and convincing evidence' standards have been met before recommending the discontinuation of life support, including nutrition and fluids? Point and counterpoint.

Authors: L J, Weber; M B, Mahowald;

Should HECs assess whether 'clear and convincing evidence' standards have been met before recommending the discontinuation of life support, including nutrition and fluids? Point and counterpoint.

No summary information available
Keywords

Ethics Committees, Social Values, Decision Making, Euthanasia, Passive, Risk Assessment, United States, Life Support Care, Withholding Treatment, Personal Autonomy, Humans, Mental Competency, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Ethics Committees, Clinical, Advance Directives

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!