
Empirical knowledge, daily diagnostic efforts and scientific spirits are the prerequisites of theoretical and practical progress in gynecopathology. The current standards in this field have their root in the continuous interests of gynecologists educated and skilled in pathology. In Germany, however, there is no more the gynecologist, who is in charge for both the clinical and pathological diagnostic business. Also, it is no more a rule for gynecologists to pass through a fellowship in pathology during their specialization. This development leads to more distance between gynecology and pathology, which per se is a potential source of misunderstandings. One of the tasks of this introduction and subsequent articles is to describe controversial areas and to offer ways out of the conflicts. Yet, the master key for avoiding misunderstandings is the close interdisciplinary co-operation in the perioperative management of the patient.
Patient Care Team, Health Services Needs and Demand, Gynecology, Germany, Pathology, Humans, Female, Forecasting, Specialization
Patient Care Team, Health Services Needs and Demand, Gynecology, Germany, Pathology, Humans, Female, Forecasting, Specialization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
