
handle: 20.500.12395/27503
The future of environment run into risk by human activities is an important issue of present days which also covers ethics and deontological aspects.Related acts as well as ethical approaches concerning with topic will be beneficial to solve the above issue. The process of Wildlife Protection and ImprovementAreas has been evolved with different arrangements since 1966, in Turkey. This study aimed to evaluate the Wildlife Protection and Improvement Areas interms of bioethics and animal protection. The study materials consisted of animal protection and local acts of wildlife (Animal Protection Act, Land HuntingLaw, Fisheries Law, Decree - Law Regarding Special Environment Protection Areas, and National Parks Law), as well as several Treaties Ratified by Turkey (BERN,CITES, Ramsar and Biodiversity). Turkey has too many protection areas in various statute, such as; National Park, Nature Park, Natural Reserve Area, NaturalProtected Area, Special Environment Protection, Internationally Important Wetland, Wildlife Protection and Improvement Areas. In total, it was determined 109Wildlife Protection Areas and 79 Wildlife Improvement Areas, as well. However, 11 animal species and waterfowls have been taken under protection inWildlife Improvement Areas. It was also emerged that the numbers of wild animals has increased and remarkable improvements have been occurred atthis period in the Wildlife Improvement Areas by launching new acts. The wild animal species which are face to face with reducing generation or die out,are taken protection and some are being breeding in their natural area without giving harm to their ecosystem in accordance with Land Hunting Act. Tofulfill respective aims, a protection of delicate natural balance and warrant of biodiversity are both necessary measures. In conclusion, it may be expressedthe national arrangements that takes into consideration the international conventions, contributes to wildlife protection. Moreover, Turkey needs to beincreased concerning studies in this respect. As a result, it can be implied that zoo-centric approach which based on the value, importance and rights of theentities should be become widespread in the Turkish society
Biyoetik, Hayvan koruma, Yaban hayatı, Veterinerlik
Biyoetik, Hayvan koruma, Yaban hayatı, Veterinerlik
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
