
doi: 10.7773/cm.v21i2.989
One of the potentially important marine resources in Mexico is the crustacean known as the red crab, Pleuroncodes plunipes, Stimpson. During a bibliographic review of the chemical composition of crustaceans, it was found that some authors report chitin as crude fiber, a structural component of plants formed principally by cellulose. It differs from chitin in that it is a homopolysarccharide and the main component of the exoskeleton of crustaceans. The objective of this work was to determine similarities and differences between the official method of estimating crude fiber and the method selected here for analyzing chitin in red crab meal. The analytical methods were: that described by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists for crude fiber, and that of Black and Schwartz for chitin. Twelve repetitions in five lots of red crab meal were conducted to determine crude fiber and chitin. The results show statistical differences between chitin and crude fiber. The conclusions indicate that despite similarities in the analytical methods and the chemical structures of crude fiber and chitin, and that they both form the structural part of the organisms and are considered as the indigestible portion, specific techniques should be used to quantify them. Using the crude fiber method instead of the chi- tin method overestimates the chitin. Since no official technique exists for determining chitin, it is recommended to use Black and Schwartz’ method since it can be adapted in a conventional food analysis laboratory.
analytical methods, crustaceans, QH301-705.5, Pleuroncodes planipes, red crab, Biology (General), chitin, crude fiber
analytical methods, crustaceans, QH301-705.5, Pleuroncodes planipes, red crab, Biology (General), chitin, crude fiber
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
